“The Emperor’s New Virus?” is a supplementary follow-up to the award winning documentary, House of Numbers. It takes an in-depth look at the scientific evidence surrounding the existence of HIV.
Video Rating: 4 / 5
Tags: Analysis, documentary, Emperors, Evidence, Existence, virus
Gallo and the American CDC are clever conspirators good luck in the church of AIDS, say hey to Jim Jones for us when they remove your stomach and your hips..
The AIDS Truth rats scatter! roflmao
I read your cut and pastes. All basic info about AZT that I read about in 1996 when started taking it. Nothing new there.
yes…ALL in your head well besides air.
All these AIDS denialist videos that you watch have warped your mind to the point that you wouldn’t know the truth from a hole in the ground. Don’t bother wasting any more of my time with your nonsense. I have blocked you. Good luck. Oh, and you’re damn right this isn’t the Lancet. They wouldn’t publish a thing you have written. Youtube obviously has no such standards.
You can rant and rave all you want. I follow approved, proven medical science, not some made-up conspiracy theories. I also use my powers of observation with how well I’m doing and all the people and friends on ARV are doing. So,carry on with your wild and absurd theories and I’ll continue living my happy healthy life. And the field of AIDS research progresses so fast that something you find yesterday CAN be outdated today. Not that you would realize that.
you didn’t read my “Cut N Paste” and again YOU”RE WRONG. pay attention to detail.
There is no such thing as “HIV -Life Cycle” it’s all in your head.
there are no rules! I can cut paste and cuss you out all fucking day long if I want too, this youtube by the way not the god damned Lancet!
ANOTHER KIND OF AIDS CRISIS by JONAH GREEN
WATCH IT! Digest a it and know that Anti- retrovirus drugs KILL!
and what is your definition of “Out dated” ? I believe if I posted a study that was released yesterday you’d whine about how old it is.
so if you were to post a study or (doctrine) from any year would you consider that “out dated’ ? or do you believe in the historical record?
google “HIV drug Matrix” for your daily denialist exercise.
Just because you believe you have no damage does not mean that you don’t have damage, some pozzies do not manifest deformities and some do. The bottom line is you can deny the FDA literature and keep preaching your anecdotal sermons or you can catch up with fact.
Watch “ AZT Poisoning – Lindsey Nagel Story” here on youtube. Even the Nobel Laureate and discoverer of the so called “HIV” admits that the drugs are NOT “HIV Specific”.
You’re an ARV Denialist.The FDA, NIH, and CDC have shown how these toxic Life-Threatening Black Boxed drugs simply destroy. you’re definitely in denial, and your anecdotal stories do not prove anything. You didn’t get the memo.
Oh, and good job on your “cut and paste” work. Yes AZT is found in two drug combinations Combivir and Trizivir, but AZT is still just AZT whether or not it combined with other medicines to form a single dose formulation.
The ARVs interfere with the replication of HIV at different points of the HIV life-cycle. So, yes they are specific to HIV. And no, they do not cause cellular destruction. I can attest to that personally. I have been taking ARV therapy for 17 years. No damage here. Far from it. I have never been healthier. No “deformities” either. Back in the mid 90s some of the drugs would cause some abnormalities, but the newer drugs do not. You need to update your information – quit watching outdated videos.
yes if you Ignore “Toxic Immunity”. None of the drugs referred to as “HIV Drugs” or ARv’s are “HIV-Specific. They simply destroy everything cellular causing destruction to the organs, skin, hair and all bodily functions. People who swallow poison can become immune to it, as with ARV’s & AZT this immunity can be 30 days to 20 years while grotesque deformities manifest.
The ORIGINAL label for AZT had the infamous Skull and Bones which was a sure sign of Poison. AZT is not safe at any dose nor are other ARV’s on the market.
“Toxic by inhalation, in contact with skin and if swallowed. Target organ(s): Blood bone marrow. If you feel unwell, seek medical advice (show the label where possible). Wear suitable protective clothing.”
AZT was originally intended to treat cancer, but failed to show efficacy and had an unacceptably high toxicity profile. (Note: There is some dispute over whether a high toxicity profile contributed to the shelving of AZT. Horwitz himself appears to have given conflicting testimony in various interviews.
AZT belongs to a class of chemical compounds known as nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors, commonly called NRTI’s. It is sold under the names Retrovir® and Retrovis®, and as an ingredient in Combivir® and Trizivir®. It was the first drug approved for the treatment of AIDS in 1987, and it was the first drug approved for “preventative” treatment of HIV/AIDS in 1990.
You OBVIOUSLY do not know what you are talking about, we forgive you of your stupidity and ignorance though.
Mail (will not be published) (required)
HIVAbout.Com is proudly powered by WordPress Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).